Thinking loudly about networked beings. Commonist. Projektionsfläche. License: CC-BY
2478 stories
·
137 followers

How to get good fried rice

1 Comment
24 little paintings of black and white bombs, falling from the sky. Half of them half USA written on them, the other half say ISR.
Detail from a bigger painting. 2024

This week’s question comes to us from Megan Butler:

What is the most dangerous inconsequential stupid opinion?

MSG is bad for you.

I grew up in Philadelphia during the 1970s, which was a great time and place for stupid opinions. We moved a lot, for reasons I don’t particularly want to get into at this moment, but at one point we found ourselves living next door to a Chinese restaurant. Now, this wasn’t a fancy place. It was a take-out joint. You ordered at the window, and sat down at the one table by the window, enjoying your cigarette, until your food came out, and off you went. The only other thing in the front room of the restaurant was a Mr. Do! video game cabinet. And this being the 70s, and Philadelphians being who they are, the place became known as Mr. Do’s, which meant the owner obviously became Mr. Do. (I shamefully have to report that if I once knew Mr. Do’s real name—and I can’t with any certainty claim that I did—that information is now lost in the mists of time. So I will continue referring to him as Mr. Do. Respectfully.)

Mr. Do also had a couple of kids the same age as me and my idiot brothers, and kids the same age tend to gravitate towards each other. Especially when we’re all broke and there isn’t much else to do. Even more especially because they had a key to the Mr. Do machine and would load it up with free credits when their dad wasn’t paying attention. To this day, I am still very good at Mr. Do.

This also meant that every once in a while their dad would hand out free bowls of fried rice to all the kids. When he fed his kids, he fed us. To this day, Mr. Do’s fried rice is the best fried rice I’ve ever had. No doubt, this has a lot to do with nostalgia, but it was also because Mr. Do fried his rice properly. With MSG.

Right around the same time as we were enjoying our Mr. Do!, our friendship, and our fried rice, stories started circulating about how MSG was bad for you. Those stories eventually ended up not just in print (which was the style of the time), but on the local news, and eventually the national news as well. Don’t eat food cooked with MSG! It was a whole thing. In fact, it’s still a thing. Just last week I passed a Chinese restaurant in San Francisco that still has a “NO MSG” sign in the window, albeit in a touristy part of town. Real city people know the truth.

Here’s the thing: there aint shit wrong with MSG. Monosodium Glutamate is a flavor enhancer. Like salt, but it’s actually lower in sodium. It’s been around forever. It occurs naturally in tomatoes and some cheeses. And yes, it’s used in a lot of Chinese cooking. But it’s far from exclusive to Chinese cooking. (McDonald’s uses it in chicken nuggets.) And yes, some people are sensitive to MSG, but honestly you have to spoon it like peanut butter to get sick from it. (I’m not a doctor. This isn’t medical advice.)

Let’s look at another thing that was happening at the time. Remember, this was the ‘70s. The United States had just finished a brutal war in Vietnam, with a little carpet-bombing in Cambodia on the side. This led to a lot of displaced people coming to America, because we’d made their countries unlivable, and destabilized most of Southeast Asia in the process. (Fuck Henry Kissenger forever.) And because immigrants are amazing, they got here and figured out how to survive. Some of them opened restaurants. (Fun fact about Mr. Do, Chinese restaurant chef and sole proprietor: he was Vietnamese.)

This upset some very racist Americans, including—but very much not limited to—the Portuguese-Americans that shared my neighborhood with Mr. Do. Including my parents, who had no shortage of commentary about how much time I spent hanging out with “those kids.” (Every immigrant group wants to shut the immigration door behind them. We saw that in the last election.)

And while very racist Americans felt safe using more direct racist language in certain circumstances, sometimes it became useful to wrap it in a veneer of an inconsequentially stupid opinion. Mind you, this was all before the advent of both cable and the internet, where anyone can, and does, post their racist opinions for all to see, and outrage fuels engagement, which makes idiots like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk richer. This was still a time when you got your news from credible old white men with gravitas on the evening news. (Not in itself unproblematic.) But it’s easier to get Walter Cronkite to do a story on MSG being bad for you, than to get him to say “whoa man, there’s suddenly too many Southeast Asians in America!”

A gentler way to do a racism. The net result is the same.

For the record, your question is amazingly complex and hard to parse, which I admired. In fact, Erika and I discussed it at length trying to figure it out. So here’s how I’m defining it: what’s a stupid thing you were told, that sounded like it was about a minor thing, but was actually about a much darker thing. Which made me think of all the things I was told as a kid, that ended up being absolute bullshit, but many of which we still carry around with us to this day. So inconsequential that we haven’t even bothered to revisit many of them.

A few years after the MSG crackdown, my friends and I (now proper weed-smoking, army-surplus-jacket-wearing teens), were embroiled in the whole “disco sucks” bullshit. Which our young idiot (and still plenty racist) selves told one another was simply a way to declare your allegiance to rock music, in the face of this upstart disco thing. In hindsight, I now understand the whole thing was both racist and homophobic. Disco very much being a celebration of gay and black and brown cultures. Again, a thing that terrified the whites, especially once the occasional white kid got drawn to it.

You’re spending too much time with “those kids.”

I do question the use of the word inconsequential in your question, because of course none of these things are inconsequential. The genius of the inconsequential stupid opinion is that it feels inconsequential. We don’t need to examine it very hard. We let it pass on through, to where it finds a crack in your foundation and takes root. Growing there, unbothered, unexamined. A sneaky piece of what makes you you. You don’t even think about it. That’s what makes it dangerous.

MSG is bad for you.

Disco sucks.

Boys don’t cry.

There’s a term called a “thought-terminating cliché” that I want to talk about. And to be honest, I’m not sure yet if “dangerous inconsequential stupid opinions” fall into that space, but they’re certainly neighbors, and they’ve definitely spent at least one Thanksgiving together. A thought-terminating cliché is a form of loaded language, presented as folk wisdom. It’s meant to short-circuit critical thinking. And it’s a fantastically effective way to get a piece of insidious thought into your head by framing it in a way that’s almost fun. Cutesy.

Let’s agree to disagree.

It is what it is.

When you spell either of these examples out, and strip away the folksy charm you’re left with some dark shit:

There is nothing you can say that will change my mind, because I’m no longer listening to reason.

Why should we expend any effort in attempting to change something when it’s far easier to go along with it.

The most important lesson Orwell tried to teach us is that the first thing fascists take from us is language. They will change it to meet their needs. They will make us think that peace is war and left is right. Trump’s very effective repetition of the phrase “fake news” did more to destroy our trust in journalism than any other reason, of which there are indeed many. Anything we disagree with can now be rebuffed with a hand wave and saying “fake news.”

We’re now arguing whether NPR and PBS are or aren’t biased, while FOX News sits in the corner sipping on a mint julep, enjoying the show.

White supremacy is now just “DEI hires.” A regime (see how I’m not calling them a government?) that’s erasing the history and accomplishments of Black Americans now just rebuffs it all with a hand wave while half-heartedly muttering “DEI hire.” And we will then spend weeks and months debating whether someone was actually a DEI hire or not, when we really need to remember and explicitly state that what we are seeing is white supremacy.

Language is important. And it turns out that the more stupid and more inconsequential it seems, the deeper it burrows into our heads.

And that is very dangerous indeed.

Many years ago, long after I’d moved out of Philadelphia—and supposedly grown up—I was on my way to dinner with a friend. We’d settled on Chinese and she picked a spot. I met her out front where she was already looking at the menu taped to the front window. After scouring the menu for what I thought was critical information, I turned to her and said “Hey, do you know if this place uses MSG?”

In her infinite kindness she replied, “Man, that’s fucking racist.”

And she was right. We ended up having a really nice dinner. It tasted great. Although still not as good as Mr. Do’s fried rice.


🙋 Got a question for me? Ask it!

📚 Buy our books! We write good books, and sell them ourselves. Because publishing… well, it is what it is.

🔍 Learning how to ask questions, such as “Hey, is this racist?” is a fantastic skill. Come learn how to do it in Erika’s Research Workshop!

🎼 The new Tunde Adebimpe is VERY MUCH worth your time.

🍉 Please donate to the Palestinian Children’s Relief Fund.

Read the whole story
tante
47 minutes ago
reply
"thought-terminating cliché is a form of loaded language, presented as folk wisdom. It’s meant to short-circuit critical thinking. And it’s a fantastically effective way to get a piece of insidious thought into your head by framing it in a way that’s almost fun. Cutesy."
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete

Meta has a cool new slop feed

1 Comment

Think About Supporting Garbage Day!

It’s $5 a month or $45 a year and you get Discord access, the coveted weekend issue, and monthly trend reports. What a bargain! Hit the button below to find out more.

The Slop Inside Your Soul

If you didn’t know, Meta recently launched a social feed for AI-generated content. The Verge has called it “nightmarish” and The Washington Post has called it “creepy.” Which, yes, it is both of those things. But it’s also fascinating. I thought journalist Matt Muir had the best take on it, writing on Bluesky, “Seeing the infinite feed of what people have been asking of The Machine. The outputs are horribly banal, but the requests are a weird window into THE (NORMIE) HUMAN SOUL AND ITS DESIRES.”

When I loaded it this morning, it was a lot of posts about Dragon Ball Z and the papal conclave (not in the same post, though, sadly).

(Meta’s slop feed)

Based on Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s podcast appearances recently, he’s pretty convinced that this is the future of social media. Though, it’s, more or less, the present of social media, as well.

You no doubt have seen AI-generated content and even AI-generated “memes” on platforms like X and YouTube by now, but the closest current analog to what Meta has built is actually Pinterest, which Garbage Day researcher Adam and I recently discovered is completely awash in AI content. Last month, for Sherwood News, we dug through Pinterest’s own metrics of top performing key words and found every category was absolutely rotten with AI-generated content, with posts oftentimes linking out to websites full of even more AI-generated content. But what Meta has built drops any pretense of a human social network.

Meta’s AI social feed, however, has also given us a genuinely useful glimpse into a world that we desperately need to know more about: What are we all privately doing with AI? It doesn’t seem totally clear that every user understands yet that their queries are public and if they do, they haven’t figured out how to engagement farm with it. And so we’ve ended up with a rare look at what the average person uses generative AI for.

This morning, when I pulled up the feed, there was a lot of your typical bad AI art — I think this one is a fetish thing? — but nestled in there were some other interesting posts. One appeared to be an audio post of a middle-aged woman arguing with the AI. Another audio post I came across was from a man who did 30 years in prison and wanted to talk to the AI about a job promotion he received recently. The post has since been deleted, which adds to my suspicion people don’t understand these are public. Another post I found was from a user trying to figure out how to sign themselves up as a caregiver for their elderly mother.

It’s weirdly intimate stuff. Which, as I wrote on Monday, is part of the hook. According to leaked documents Business Insider got ahold of from Scale AI, the contractor that Meta partnered with for Meta AI, the AI assistant is meant to be “flirty,” but not sexual. The vision here is to use a playful machine to hook users, rather than the engagement of other humans, and lock them into a fully-automated ecosystem that Meta owns.

And as someone who has covered late-stage Facebook extensively, I can clearly see why Meta is experimenting with a purely-AI feed like this. Facebook, and to a slightly lesser extent, Instagram both have a problem. They chased scale in the 2010s and now have a massively global audience that can’t properly communicate with each other. This wouldn’t be a problem if Facebook was still for friends and family, but the COVID era pivot to a TikTok-like entertainment hub has meant a need for increased or, at least, uniform standard of content. Semi-professional-ish posts and videos that can keep people logged in. So what do you do with three billion aging users, the majority of which don’t speak the same language or, perhaps, can even read, and might not be able to afford editing programs like Photoshop or Premiere? Well, an AI that can generate images and videos and take audio prompts solves this. In fact, Meta AI solves every problem Facebook has right now. A platform with no need for third-party links, where the content moderation is baked into the content itself, an app that, again, as I wrote on Monday, if you can make it addicting enough, people might pay you directly to use it. A financial proposition for a company with 3.98 billion monthly active users across all their different apps so mouth-watering and irresistible that you almost sympathize with their decision to commit so fully to something so grim and ugly and insane as this.


The following is a paid ad. If you’re interested in advertising, email me at ryan@garbageday.email and let’s talk. Thanks!

Keep Your SSN Off The Dark Web

Every day, data brokers profit from your sensitive info—phone number, DOB, SSN—selling it to the highest bidder. What happens then? Best case: companies target you with ads. Worst case: scammers and identity thieves breach those brokers, leaving your data vulnerable or on the dark web. It's time you check out Incogni. It scrubs your personal data from the web, confronting the world’s data brokers on your behalf. And unlike other services, Incogni helps remove your sensitive information from all broker types, including those tricky People Search Sites.

Help protect yourself from identity theft, spam calls, and health insurers raising your rates. Plus, just for Garbage day readers: Get 55% off Incogni using code DAYDEAL.


A Very Serious Food Reviewer

@joeishungrybite

Arby's New Quarter Pound Brisket Sandwich Review * Cedric's Sweet BBQ Sauce * Joe is Hungry #fyo #fyoupage #foryou #foryoupage #foryoupage... See more

I came across this thanks to X user @wyermush, who described it as, “the greatest food reviews I’ve ever seen,” and, yep, that is exactly right.


JD Vance Likes The Star Wars Prequels Because Of Course He Does

This post on X from Vice President JD Vance was in response to a post from right-wing influencer Jack Posobiec who decided to celebrate May the Fourth by complaining about the Disney Star Wars sequels. A good reminder that these guys have a big wheel of bull shit they like to spin whenever they can to rile up their digital armies of lonely men.

It should not be surprising to anyone that our vice president, who used to blog about Garden State on LiveJournal, has bizarre opinions about media that are frozen in the 2000s, but Vance’s prequel endorsement does pose a real risk to prequel revisionism, as X user @coopercooperco pointed out. Xillennials and Gen Z have spent years trying to argue that the Star Wars prequels are good, actually, and someone as sauceless as Vance — even to right-wingers — publicly saying they’re good could derail the entire thing. Sad.

In other presidential media consumption news, President Donald Trump said this week that he wants to reopen Alcatraz prison. Which is a problem for many reasons, the biggest one being that it’s currently a museum and national park. But beyond the logistics of such an idea, the more important question is where did the idea come from?

Well, according to X user @Mollyploofkins, Clint Eastwood’s 1979 film Escape from Alcatraz was playing on local TV stations in Florida over the weekend. Did the president see something on TV and decide it’s national policy now? Well, that’s literally how he spent his entire first term governing, so, yes, probably.


Memeing Our Way Into A Nuclear Apocalypse

It shouldn’t surprise me anymore that politicians are live-memeing wars. By my estimate, this became the new normal with the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. But it’s still very off-putting! Even if we are living in a world where the US government is making state-sponsored fancams of immigrants being sent to a foreign gulag. But regardless, I am still very nervous about the way the current conflict in Pakistan and India — two nuclear powers, mind you — is playing out online.

The Indian Army’s official X account is posting things like “justice is served,” complete with image macros celebrating last night’s airstrikes. While Pakistan Defense Minister Khawaja Asif is posting things like the video above, which is, uh, pretty intense!!


K-Pop Fans Had A Weird Met Gala

(Photo by Taylor Hill/Getty Images)

Lisa, K-Pop idol and star of the most recent season of White Lotus, attended the Met Gala this week and generated quite a bit of controversy. I will not be linking to posts about it, for reasons that will become very obvious in just a second, but X users became convinced that her underwear featured a picture of Rosa Parks on it. Which, if that were true, would, yeah, probably be a very weird and bad decision. And it wasn’t totally impossible to believe considering some of Lisa’s past decisions when it comes to race.

As one user wrote about the ensuing discourse, “‘Rosa Parks’ and ‘pussy’ have been in far too many tweets in the last 10 mins. The damage K-Pop has done to society is irreparable.” Though, the drama did give us an incredible K-Pop stan crash out, as one user seemed to think Rosa Parks was some kind of pop star and that Lisa was being “dragged” by her stans.

The designer behind Lisa’s outfit told Page Six that her underwear did not feature Rosa Parks’ face on it, but, instead, a picture of his neighbor. Which is, honestly, weirder, I think!


Pope Crave Goes To The Vatican / “Old Man Yaoi”

Conclave/Catholicism fan account Pope Crave is currently reporting live from Vatican City as the papal conclave begins. Which is certainly a sentence.

I’ve had a tough time finding the words to explain the very bizarre fandom reaction to the conclave, but I think I finally came across a post that sums it up quite nicely. As X user @hailtherethere wrote, “The ‘wow I wanna watch this movie’ to ‘old man yaoi enthusiast’ to ‘watching a live broadcast of the real life conclave mass while opening 10 wiki tabs’ pipeline is so real and so scary.”

“Yaoi,” for those not in the know, is the Japanese term for manga depicting man on man romantic and, more often than not, sexual love. And, yes, there is A LOT of Conclave yaoi out there. In my experience, the Korean-language accounts on X are posting the filthiest stuff.

In a strange bit of media collapse, not only are real life cardinals watching Conclave to prepare for the real conclave, but now, Conclave fans are shipping real life cardinals they way they were making “old man yaoi” of the fake cardinals from the movie. Got all that?


A Good Met Gala Look


Did you know Garbage Day has a merch store?

You can check it out here!



P.S. here’s Central Park, but with mud.

***Any typos in this email are on purpose actually***

Read the whole story
tante
59 minutes ago
reply
"The vision here is to use a playful machine to hook users, rather than the engagement of other humans, and lock them into a fully-automated ecosystem that Meta owns."
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete

The AI Slop Presidency

1 Comment

Trump has found an aesthetic to define his second term: grotesque AI slop.

Over the weekend, the Trump administration posted at least seven different pieces of AI generated or AI altered media, ranging from Trump imagining himself as a pope and a Star Wars Jedi (or Sith?) to Obama-esque “Hope” posters featuring people the administration has deported

This has become the Slop Presidency, and AI-generated images are the perfect artistic medium for the Trump presidency. They're impulsively created, grotesque, and low-effort. Trumpworld’s fascination with slop is the logical next step for a President that, in his first term, regularly retweeted random memes created by his army of supporters on Discord or The Donald, a subreddit that ultimately became a Reddit-clone website after it was banned. AI allows his team to create media that would never exist otherwise, a particularly useful tool for a President and administration that has a hostile relationship with reality. 

Trump’s original fascination with AI slop began last summer, after he said legal Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were “eating the cats…they’re eating the pets” in his debate with Kamala Harris. The internet’s AI slop factories began spinning up images of Trump as cat-and-dog savior. Since then, Trump and the administration have occasionally shared or reposted AI slop. In his first week in office, Trump shared an AI-generated “GM” car image that was promoting $TRUMP coin. “What a beautiful car. Congrats to GM!,” he posted.

At the end of February, Trump shared a video on his Truth Social account that imagined a world where Gaza was turned into a Trump Casino

But this weekend, Trump began sharing AI slop on a level we’ve not seen before.

Trump’s AI-tinged weekend began on Friday night with a photo-realistic picture of himself as the Pope on his Truth Social account. The White House reposted a screenshot of the image on X, which pissed off the Catholic Church.

“This is deeply offensive to Catholics especially during this sacred time that we are still mourning the death of Pope Francis and praying for the guidance of the Holy Spirit for the election of our new Pope. He owes an apology,” Thomas Paprocki, an American Bishop in Illinois, said on X.

During a press conference on Monday, Trump dismissed the accusation that the Trump Pope was offensive and then said he didn’t post it. “The Catholics loved it. I had nothing to do with it,” Trump said. “Somebody made up a picture of me dressed like the Pope and they put it out on the internet,” Trump said. “That’s not me that did it, I have no idea where it came from. Maybe it was AI. But I know nothing about it. I just saw it last evening.”

All political movements are accompanied by artists who translate the politics into pictures, writing, and music. Adolf Ziegler captured the Nazi ideal in paintings. Stalin’s Soviet Union churned out mass produced and striking propaganda posters that wanted citizens about how to live. The MAGA movement’s artistic aesthetic is AI slop and Donald Trump is its king. It is not concerned with convincing anyone or using art to inform people about its movement. It seeks only to upset people who aren’t on board and excite the faithful because it upsets people.

Not content to just aggravate Catholics, the Trump administration then used AI to offend adherents of another of America’s major religions: Star Wars fans. On May the 4th, the official White House X account posted an AI-generated image of a muscle bound Trump wielding a red light saber and flanked by two bald eagles.

“Happy May the 4th to all, including the Radical Left Lunatics who are fighting so hard to to [sic] bring Sith Lords, Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners, & well known MS-13 Gang Members, back into our Galaxy. You’re not the Rebellion—you’re the Empire,” it said in the post. “May the 4th be with you.” As the replies pointed out, red light sabers are typically used by villains.

This was just one of a series of Star Wars related AI-generated cringe that went out from official Trump admin accounts over the weekend. DOD Rapid Response on X (an account that publishes propaganda on behalf of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth) posted a five minute video that contained a Star Wars intro style scroll of Trump’s “accomplishments” before treating viewers to a pic of Trump and Hegseth as Jedi. The account for the U.S. Army’s Pacific Command sent out an “AI-enhanced” image of soldiers doing a training exercise. Both of the soldiers’s weapons were replaced with lightsabers.

Trump and the people who created AI-image generators do not respect artists. There is no style that either will not exploit or sully. OpenAI reduced Hayao Miyazaki's life’s work to a gross meme, and the White House played along. For years the Lofi Girl has sat in windows on screens across the planet while people studied, read, and worked. Over the weekend the White House YouTube channel ran “Lo-Fi MAGA Video to Relax/ Study To” while an animated President Trump sat at a desk, mimicking the Lofi Girl.

Maybe you don’t like Star Wars, are unmoved by Studio Ghibli films, or have never chilled to lofi beats. It doesn’t matter, the message is clear: if you love something Trump will pervert it. Nothing will be untouched. Sacred objects and beloved art exist only to be desecrated. AI has made that as easy as pushing a button.

AI generated slop content is part of a brute force attack on the algorithms that control reality and the Trump administration’s constant use of AI art reflects its own brute force attack on American democracy. It’s not just that its aesthetics are useful for Trump, its entire mode of being is useful for how his administration has governed so far, by brute forcing the Presidency with a slew of executive orders, budget cuts, attacks on institutions, and sloppily executed deportations. The strategy is to overwhelm the American bureaucracy and the legal system, and to exhaust his enemies with an endless stream of bullshit; by the time we shake out what’s legal and what’s not, much of the damage has already been done. 

One of the wonderful things about making art is the process. A lot happens between conception and execution. An idea pops into an artist's head and it changes dramatically while they attempt to render that idea into reality. That doesn’t happen with AI-generated images. There is no creation process, there is only instant gratification. Whatever impulsive and grotesque thought pops into the mind of the creator can immediately be realized.

And so every revenge fantasy Trump and his followers ever wanted can be made real at a moment’s notice. On March 27, the White House X account posted a Ghibli-style AI image of a crying woman being arrested by ICE. 

Here is a real woman who has been accused of a crime, her image appropriated by the state and rendered into a cartoon. America has total power over this woman. Arrested for drug trafficking, her image has been plastered all over the internet. She’ll be deported. Not content with total control over her body and future, the administration has made her into a caricature and invited its followers to mock her online.



Read the whole story
tante
1 day ago
reply
"It’s not just that [AI slop's] aesthetics are useful for Trump, its entire mode of being is useful for how his administration has governed so far"
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete

AfD gesichert rechtsextrem: Drei Wörter: AfD, Verbot, jetzt

1 Comment
Der Verfassungsschutz stuft die gesamte AfD als gesichert rechtsextrem ein. Jetzt sollte ein Verbotsverfahren der Partei angestrebt werden. mehr...
Read the whole story
tante
4 days ago
reply
"Die AfD hat sich selbst entschieden, rechtsextrem zu werden. Die Hochstufung ist folgerichtig. Herzlichen Glückwunsch, der Preis dafür muss lauten: Verbotsverfahren!"
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete

The Myth of Plastic Recycling

1 Comment


A cartoon by me and Becky Hawkins.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has four panels. There’s also a tiny “kicker” panel under the strip.

PANEL 1

A researcher wearing a white lab coat and carrying a thick bound report walks into an executive’s office. The executive is sitting with his feet on a big desk.

RESEARCHER: Here’s my report on plastic recycling… I’m afraid it’s bad news. Recycling plastic just won’t work.

PANEL 2

A close up of the researcher, who looks very nervous.

RESEARCHER: Recycling plastic costs so much that recycled plastic will never compete with new plastic. The only thing it might do is deceive the public into thinking there’s no problem.

PANEL 3

The executive is now holding the report. Behind the researcher, two toughs are creeping up, one raising a bludgeoning tool up to hit the researcher, the other holding out a sack big enough to hide a body.

RESEARCHER: To avoid an ecological crisis, we have to stop making so much plastic.

EXECUTIVE: I see. By the way, is this the only copy of the report?

RESEARCHER: Yes, why?

PANEL 4

CAPTION: And so, for the next fifty years…

A spokesmodel woman stands in front of cameras, next to a table overflowing with plastic products.

SPOKESMODEL: Use all the plastic you want! We’ll recycle!

TINY KICKER PANEL

The spokesmodel yells at Barry.

SPOKESMODEL: Use somewhat less plastic? You want us to live like cavemen?

CHICKEN FAT WATCH

“Chicken fat” is obsolete cartoonists’ jargon for unimportant but fun details.

PANEL 1 – A framed graph on the wall seems to show profits moving up. The caption under the graph says “Sales of profit/loss charts up 47%”

PANEL 2 – One of the pens in the researcher’s breast pocket is actually a little test tube containing bubbling green liquid.

PANEL 4 – The backdrop says “Plastic: It’s what’s for dinner.” A little toy plastic car is being driven by a plastic kitten and unicorn. A label of a large bottle says “5 GAL background details.”


The Myth of Plastic Recycling | Patreon

Read the whole story
tante
4 days ago
reply
"Recycling plastic costs so much that recycled plastic will never compete with new plastic. The only thing it might do is deceive the public into thinking there’s no problem."
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete

Are “AI” systems really tools?

1 Comment

I was on a panel on “AI” yesterday (was in German so I don’t link it i this post, specifics don’t matter too much) and a phrase came up that stuck with me on my way home (riding a bike is just the best thing for thinking). That phrase was

AI systems are just tools and we need to learn how to use them productively.

And – spoiler alert – I do not think that is true for most of the “AI” systems we see sold these days.

When you ask people to define what a “tool” is they might say something like “a tool is an object that enables or enhances your ability to solve a specific problem”. We think of tools as something augmenting our ability to do stuff. Now that isn’t false, but I think it hides or ignores some of the aspects that make a tool an actual tool. Let me give you an example.

I grew up in a rural area in the north of Germany. Which means there really wasn’t a lot to to TBH. This lead to me being able to open a beer bottle with a huge number of objects: Another bottle, a folding ruler, cutlery, a hammer, a piece of wood, etc. But is the piece of wood a tool or is it more of a makeshift kind of thing that I use tool-like?

Because an actual tool is designed for a certain way of solving a set of problems. Tools materialize not just intent but also knowledge and opinion on how to solve a specific problem, ideas about the people using the tools and their abilities as well as a model of the problem itself and the objects related to it. In that regard you can read a tool like a text.

A screwdriver for example assumes many things: For example about the structural integrity of the things you want to connect to each other and whether you are allowed to create an alteration to the object that will never go away (the hole that the screw creates). It also assumes that you have hands to grab the screwdriver and the strength to create the necessary torque.

I think there is a difference between fully formed tools (like a screwdriver or a program or whatever) and objects that get tool-like usage in a specific case. Sometimes these objects are still proto-tools, tools on their way of solidifying, experiments that try o settle on a model and a solution of the problem. Think a screwdriver where the handle is too narrow so you can’t grab it properly. Other objects are “makeshifts”, objects that could sometimes be used for something but that usage is not intended, not obvious. That’s me using a folding ruler to open a beer bottle (or another drink with a similar cap, but I learned it with beer).

Tools are not just “things you can use in a way”, they are objects that have been designed with great intent for a set of specific problems, objects that through their design make their intended usage obvious and clear (specialized tools might require you to have a set of domain knowledge to have that clarity). In a way tools are a way to transfer knowledge: Knowledge about the problem and the solutions are embedded in the tool through the design of it. Sure I could tell you that you can easily tighten a screw my applying the right torque to it, but that leaves you figuring out how to get that done. The tool contains that. Tools also often explicitly exclude other solutions. They are opinionated (more or less of course).

In the Python community there is a saying: “There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it.” This is what I mean. The better the tool, the clearer it’s guiding you towards a best practice solution. Which leads me to thinking about “AI”.

When I say “AI” here I am not talking about specialized machine learning models that are intended for a very specific case. Think a visual model that only detects faces in a video feed. I am thinking about “AI” as it is pushed into the market by OpenAI, Anthropic etc.: “AI” is this one solution to everything (eventually).

And here the tool idea falls apart: ChatGPT isn’t designed for anything. Or as Stephen Farrugia argues in this video: AI is presented as a Swiss army knife, “as something tech loves to compare its products to, is something that might be useful in some situations.

This is not a tool. This is not a well-designed artifact that tries to communicate you clear solutions to your actual problems and how to implement them. It’s a playground, a junk shop where you might eventually find something interesting. It’s way less a way to solve problems than a way to keep busy feeling like you are working on a problem while doing something else.

Again, there are neural networks and models that clearly fit into my definition of a tool. But here we are at the distinction of machine learning an “AI” again: Machine learning is written in Python, AI is written in LinkedIn posts and Powerpoint presentations.

Tool making is a social activity. Tools often do not emerge fully formed but go through iterations withing a community, take their final shape through the use by a community of practitioners and their feedback. All tools we use today are deeply social, historical objects that have embedded the knowledge and experiences of hundreds or thousands of people in order to create “progress”, to formalize certain solutions so we can spend our brain capacity on figuring out the next thing or to just create something beautiful or fun. Our predecessors have suffered through proto-tools and all the hurt that comes from using them so we wouldn’t have to. And this social, temporal context is all part of a tool.

And the big “AI” systems that supposedly are “just tools” now do not have any of that. They are a new thing but for most problems they hope that you find ways of using them. They do in a way take away hundreds of years of social learning and experience and leave you alone in front of an empty prompt field.

So no, I do not think that the “AI” systems that big tech wants us to use (and rent from them) are tools. They are makeshifts at best.

Read the whole story
tante
10 days ago
reply
"All tools we use today are deeply social, historical objects that have embedded the knowledge and experiences of hundreds or thousands of people in order to create “progress”[…]And the big “AI” systems that supposedly are “just tools” now do not have any of that."
Berlin/Germany
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories